9/11 Truth Movement

AE911Truth Evidence Goes to UK Court! Feb 25, 2013

Breaking Press Release Thursday, 14 February 2013
Historic Case to Challenge BBC’s 9/11 Coverage!
This is a background video for the ones not aware of the 9/11 Truther Movement headed by the over 1,500 US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). www.ae911truth.org/…
On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public. This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public.

As a continuation of this process with BBC, documentary film maker Tony Rooke has decided to take a personal stand on this issue. People in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV licence fee which is used to fund BBC’s operations. Tony has refused to pay his TV licence fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation.
Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000, Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. Tony’s claim is that BBC has withheld scientific evidence which demonstrates that the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public. According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account.

Rooke has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11 researchers:

The date and location of the hearing are as follows:
February 25th at 10:00 am
Horsham Magistrates’ Court [Court 3]
The Law Courts
Hurst Road
West Sussex
RH12 2ET

For further information, please contact Peter Drew, AE911Truth UK Action Group Leader, at truthfor911@hotmail.co.uk
For further info please visit:

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

25 thoughts on “9/11 Truth Movement

  1. By the way I have already done research… apparently more than you have. They say the towers were built to withstand this… despite the architects who designed it commenting that they grossly underestimated the force of the impact. Civilian buildings are not designed to both take an impact of that caliber AND deal with fire at the same time. The presumption has always been that the fuel from a crash would burn off too quickly to pose any real danger. Most prolonged fires start from neglegence.

  2. Steel loses 50% of it’s strength at 1,200 degrees (f)… Those fires even by the reports most truthers accept as true reached about 1,800 degrees (f). The thing about a truss is that due to their light weight design ANY breakage of a truss renders it almost completely compromized leaving the trusses adjacent to it to pick up the slack. One break in the fireproofing combined with exposure to those temperatures is all it would take to for a truss to fail.

  3. Get enough trusses to fail and the remaining trusses begin to have too much load shifted over to them which can result in a cascade failure of every truss on that entire floor. Trusses are not exactly new to these issues by the way. Urban firemen have a saying… “don’t trust the truss.” this saying has been born from the unfortunate deaths of firemen unlucky enough to be caught directly beneath a truss right at the moment if it’s failure. That is without such extenuating circumstances

  4. By the way… I happen to be an engineer so I have a great deal more insight on this than you do. P.S. There is a good reason why only 3% of the engineers in this country are affiliated with the A&E truth group. Did you even know that the majority of those guys are not even structural engineers? Actually almost none of them are… Their spokesperson early on was actually an electrical engineering technician…

  5. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth of Nano Thermite in the dust of WTC 1, 2, and 7? Have you seen building 7 collapse?
    Why so perfectly in its own footprint and announced beforehand?
    Isn’t it odd that a steel framed structure which happened to conveniently house the, CIA, FBI, Emergency bunker for Mayor Giuliani (Recently upgraded at that) and thousands of records into the book cooking misdeeds of Enron and Worldcom would fall so neatly so quickly without being struck by a plane?

  6. To many unanswered questions and loose strings to satisfy the public still remain. We never had a full investigation. Evidence was quickly hauled away. Americans have begun to question everything since we have been lied to for so long. Accountability keeps people/politicans honest and there is nothing what so ever wrong with that. We want answers in the form of truth for a change. Peace.

  7. Their “proof” for thermite is red chips found in dust samples that were collected a couple of years after the towers fell. These samples came from various sources all of which claiming the samples came from the towers, but none of which can be proven to be from there or be proven that they have not been tampered with in the time since the collapse… Does that sound like good science to you?

  8. The reason why it was “announced beforehand” is actually quite simple. I don’t know how well you remember, but that was a rather chaotic and confusing day. Hell I remember hearing someone claim the highjackers where Chinese… point is everyone was in such a rush to get information which was in short supply and some people ended up getting that information wrong. The news program that reported the collapse early simply got their information wrong.

  9. It is not like a news program can’t fuck up from time to time… Hell I once saw one of them report that a space shuttle would reach 18 times the speed of light on reentry… yea… because fuck physics. They meant to say sound but someone fucked up. Kind of like if someone calls in to say “we suspect the tower may collapse” it can turn into “the tower collapsed” by the time it reaches it reaches the news anchors.

  10. By the way no tower 7 was not hjt by a plane, but it, like many of the other buildings around it, got pummeled by falling debris from towers 1&2. One of these impacts started a fire. It may not have been hit by a plane, but it still managed to take a serious pounding and catch fire. And if you watch the video again you will see the penthouse on tower 7 collapsed a full 8 seconds before the rest of the building… I wouldn’t call that quick.

  11. You just don’t get it do you… This circular logic you are following is just the elephant in the room that you ignore isn’t it? “We have too many unanswered questions so we ask them to tell us… but they are always lying to us.”… WTF!?! Here is a thought… If you think all they are going to do is lie to you then why would you be expecting the truth out of them?

  12. More to the point… If you always assume every answer you get that does not match your expectation of the truth to be a lie… without actually investigating it as a possibility mind you… How you you even know you aren’t already being told the truth? Or do you just assume everything the government and other authoritative organizations tell you to be a lie simply on the basis that you believe them to be liar

  13. The time has sadly come and gone when you could take one/government at their word. It use to mean something. Not anymore. How often can you keep believing them? How often would you believe a spouse,friend or neighbor who has been caught in lies one after another for personal/political gain or any other reason?
    The days of blind trust are over. Thank God most people have wised up and cannot be so easly fooled anymore. We now ask for proof.

  14. Excuse me… I just want to clarify something. Did I in any way state that you should just blindly trust the government (or anyone else for that matter)? No… I don’t recall stating or even insinuating that notion. In fact the one thing I applaud is your refusal to simply trust the government, however, I condemn the excessive extent to which you take it.

  15. To not trust them is one thing but to refuse to believe anything they say simply because it does not fit your idea of what the truth is goes far beyond the scope of normal scrutiny. Effectively you are saying “tell me what I already know to be true or you are a liar”… You only ever even bother to research notions that agree with your preconcieved notion of truth never once investigating the possibility that you could be wrong.

  16. And you ask for proof? Really? Have you even examined the official findings yourself or do you just >BLINDLY TRUST< the conspiracy theorists to cover it well enough that you don't need to? Use your own head... Just as you shouldn't let the government dictate what you should believe you also should not just blindly follow those preaching conspiracy theory as if they are some kind of new age messiah either. You have a brain and I don't think it is defective so put it to good use.

  17. And you know just one more thing… I already mentioned that I am an engineer. Do you really think that arguing with me on matters of engineering is the wisest course of action here? Actually you aren’t even really doing that. You posed questions to me regarding so called evidence anticipating I wouldn’t be able to answer yet when I do answer you refuse to acknowledge my insight on the matter and just continue spouting idealistic nonsense. Did you even read what I had to say about the evidence?

  18. I have read many such “evidence” debates and you know there is still not one engineer that can tell me why building 7 was announced on live tv by bbc as having collaped while it was still standing in the background.

  19. Clearly you have not been reading my comments thoroughly then because I just did. Foreign news organizations have information sharing partnerships with our domestic news companies. That way they can get information from places where they don’t have any reporters on location. When you have information getting passed around like that you do get the occasional mistake where someone gets given the wrong info. When that happens that incorrect information gets aired.

  20. Because the BBC, like other international news services, were getting their information from Reuters who had been told that 7 was about to fall some time previously to when it actually did. One must presume that it was assumed that, given the time gap, the building must have fallen.

  21. In an Orwellian society as we have there will always be some people who feel just fine with things as they are. Others, even though we may (or may not) live comfortably, still desire even demand a better world for our offspring and all who come after us.

  22. Do you have your head so buried into the sand that you do not realize ALL of msm has been bought and sold? They are only a propaganda machine with very few true “Investagative Jouralist” brave enough to report the truth. Those that do report it the editors toss it out and they are eventually fired.
    Thankfully most come over to alternative news. I am a free thinker. I do not want anyone else deciding what I should think,eat,drink or otherwise control my life here on earth. (cont)

  23. I am a Libertainian. You sound like a Lefty Liberal and never the two shall agree so I suggest you stick with engineering job producing video games as your channel describes and let the real engineers handle the building structures. I am done.

  24. 9/11=US/CIA False Flag!
    ReThink9/11. org
    See: 9/11 Core of Corruption; 9/11 Conspiracy Solved; 9/11Theories: Expert vs Expert; 9/11:False-Flag Terrorism; Hard 9/11 Truth-$; 9/11 Painful Deceptions; 9/11 Key CIA Connections; 9/11 The Myth& Reality; WAR PROMISES; Loose Change; 9/11 Experts Speak Out; 9/11 The Birth of Treason; When False Flags Don’t Fly; The Oil Factor; 9/11 Exposed-facts; Wake Up Call; All Wars are Bankers Wars; Truth about Halliburton; FallOfTheRepublic; Human the film (full)

Leave a Reply